2.0 KiB
Flows — what is implemented, and how to test it
Populated by phase 3 — not yet written. It is the biggest phase in the chain (2–4 sessions). Until then the closest things are manual-testing-plan.md and RUNBOOK.md — both partly stale, see below.
One file per user-meaningful journey, not per screen. Each answers three questions and no others: what it does, what is real versus mocked, and the exact steps to walk it against a running stack.
This page becomes the status table — every flow, one row, with its Last verified date. It is the
page you check before believing anything else in docs/.
Planned contents
| File | Covers |
|---|---|
testing-setup.md |
Bring-up, demo accounts, the seeded world, OTP retrieval, reset, troubleshooting |
<flow>.md × ~23 |
One per journey — the candidate list is in phase 3 |
Before writing testing-setup.md
Four contradictions land squarely on the bring-up story, and phase 3 has to settle them rather than copy either source. All are logged in _plan/open-contradictions.md:
- C-1 —
manual-testing-plan.mdstill tells you to set crypto keys viadotnet user-secrets, which was removed in5885280.RUNBOOK.mdis already correct on this; only the one file is stale. - C-3 — the API listens on
http://localhost:5002, nothttps://, in 18 places' worth of prose. - C-4 — the
dotnet dev-certs https --truststep therefore has nothing to trust. - C-5 —
RUNBOOK.mdstarts a local SQL Server in Docker; the committed dev config points at a remote one. These are not the same world: the remote DB is already seeded, a fresh local one is not, and its data is encrypted under keys that must match exactly.
Pick one bring-up path, verify it end to end, and say plainly what the other one was.